Paste a URL and the page source, then run the audit. Nothing you paste leaves your browser.
Assumptions: the scoring rubric
Every value here is what the original tool used; none is a benchmark. Change one and the result above recomputes so you can see exactly how the number was made. The rubric is our choice of what a B2B page should declare, not a schema.org or search-engine standard.
What this measures. The four-engine retrieval panel (ChatGPT / Claude / Perplexity / Gemini) leans on structured data when ranking citation candidates. Pages without Organization, BreadcrumbList, and (where applicable) Service / FAQPage / HowTo JSON-LD get systematically under-cited even when their content is strong. This tool surfaces the gap.
What it doesn't measure. Schema is necessary, not sufficient. The GEO subscription runs this audit weekly on a deeper page set, ships the suggested PR pack as a reviewed patch you can apply (not a screenshot), and measures citation-share lift across the engine panel monthly.
